The social paediatrics initiative: a RICHER model of primary health care for at risk children and their families
© Wong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 28 April 2011
Accepted: 26 September 2012
Published: 4 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 Apr 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amy Houtrow|
|21 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jean-Francois Trani|
|21 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Sabrina Wong|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jean-Francois Trani|
|8 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amy Houtrow|
|26 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Sabrina Wong|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amy Houtrow|
|14 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Sabrina Wong|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|14 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|26 Sep 2012||Editorially accepted|
|4 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2431-12-158|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.