Effect of routine probiotic, Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938, use on rates of necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates with birthweight < 1000 grams: a sequential analysis
© Hunter et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 28 February 2012
Accepted: 31 August 2012
Published: 4 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - GIRISH DESHPANDE|
|29 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yvonne Dommels|
|20 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Gal|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - GIRISH DESHPANDE|
|9 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yvonne Dommels|
|29 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Gal|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|4 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2431-12-142|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.