Variation in lumbar punctures for early onset neonatal sepsis: a nationally representative serial cross-sectional analysis, 2003-2009
© Patrick et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 6 September 2011
Accepted: 23 August 2012
Published: 28 August 2012
Whether lumbar punctures (LPs) should be performed routinely for term newborns suspected of having early onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) is subject to debate. It is unclear whether variations in performance of LPs for EONS may be associated with patient, hospital, insurance or regional factors. Our objective was to identify characteristics associated with the practice of performing LPs for suspected EONS in a nationally representative sample.
Utilizing data from the 2003, 2006 and 2009 Kids’ Inpatient Database (KID) compiled by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, we examined the frequency and characteristics of term, normal-birth weight newborns receiving an LP for EONS. Survey-weighting was applied for national estimates and used in chi squared and multivariable regression analysis.
In 2009, there were 13,694 discharges for term newborns that underwent LPs for apparent EONS. Newborns having LPs performed were more likely to be covered by Medicaid vs. private insurance (51.9 vs. 45.1 percent; p < 0.001), be born in urban vs. rural hospitals (94.8 vs. 87.3 percent; p < 0.001), teaching vs. non-teaching (60.8 vs. 43.1 percent; p < 0.001) and children’s hospitals vs. non-children’s (23.0 vs. 11.2 percent; p < 0.001). Lastly, newborns having LPs performed were disproportionately born in the Northeast census region (p = 0.03). In multi-year adjusted analysis, infants with Medicaid coverage, and those born in urban or teaching hospitals, consistently had higher odds of having an LP performed.
We found pronounced variation in LPs performed for EONS, even when adjusting for clinical conditions that would prompt LPs. These findings indicate practice variations in newborn care that merit further examination and explanation.
KeywordsNeonatal Sepsis Lumbar puncture Variation Early onset neonatal sepsis
Lumbar punctures (LPs) are commonly performed on newborns suspected of having sepsis . Over the last thirty years, numerous studies have evaluated the utility of LPs in identifying early onset neonatal sepsis (EONS). While several studies found that LPs were unnecessary among asymptomatic newborns suspected of having EONS for risk factors related to maternal reasons [2–4] or with respiratory signs [5, 6], other analyses found that cases of meningitis were missed when an LP was not performed on this population [7, 8].
In 2002, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)  released guidelines for the diagnostic approach of a newborn suspected of having EONS attributable to Group B Streptococcus (GBS), the most common causative organism among normal-birth weight infants [1, 10]. These guidelines state that LPs should be reserved for newborns with “signs” of a systemic infection and should not be performed on newborns without “signs”. Despite this, “signs” of a systemic infection can be subtle such as poor feeding, irritability or a high-pitched cry, leading to some variability in the diagnosis [1, 11]. In addition, it is unclear how broadly these guidelines have been adopted.
Institutional variation in practice has previously been described in newborn care [12, 13]. Given conflicting data about the utility of performing an LP for EONS, we hypothesize that there is variation in LPs among institutions caring for newborns related to factors such as teaching status or to regional location. Because normal-birth weight infants are less likely than low-birth weight infants to be born with co-morbid conditions that might prompt an LP, we sought to evaluate LP variation among only normal-birth weight newborns. To address these issues in a broad sample, we utilized multiple years of a nationally representative dataset to assess whether the practice of performing LP for EONS varied by child, hospital or insurance characteristics for normal-birth weight infants.
Data were obtained from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s (AHRQ) Kids’ Inpatient Database (KID) from 2003, 2006 and 2009 (the most recent year available). The KID is part of a broad set of databases developed by AHRQ as part of a federal-state-industry partnership through the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). HCUP includes the largest collection of hospital care data in the United States and includes all payers.
KID was specifically designed to evaluate a broad range of conditions and procedures affecting children. It is the only national hospital administrative dataset specifically designed to assess use of hospital services by newborns. KID is compiled in order to obtain a nationally representative sample, which allows for sufficient statistical power to evaluate rare conditions and procedures. This sample includes 80 percent of pediatric discharges and 10 percent of all uncomplicated births .
Utilizing the KID, we examined the frequency and the characteristics of newborns that underwent an LP for EONS. Given that nearly all LPs for newborns are performed within the first week of life and that treatment of meningitis is generally 14 to 21 days , we limited our sample to newborns whose length of stay was less than 21 days. Newborns weighing less than 2500 grams or who were transferred from another facility were excluded from the analysis.
Using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9 CM), we identified neonatal diagnoses and procedures. To first identify our sample, infants with LPs performed were identified using ICD-9 procedure code (03.31). Clinical characteristics of the sample of newborns were then identified using ICD-9 CM codes: any infection (771.0–771.8), temperature instability (778.0–778.9), meningitis (320.0–320.9, 321.0–321.8, 322.0–322.8, 036.0) and respiratory diagnoses (769, 770.0–770.9). Rates of LPs performed and meningitis diagnoses are expressed as per 100,000 hospital births.
Newborn characteristics were further categorized as male or female. Race/ethnicity was missing for more than 25% of newborns and was therefore excluded from the analysis. Insurance was categorized as private insurance, Medicaid, self-pay (uninsured) and other (Tricare, etc.). Utilizing the newborn’s home zip code, median income for that zip code was provided in the KID and further subdivided into national quartiles. Birth weight was determined through diagnostic data provided in the dataset, described elsewhere .
Hospital characteristics were assigned using variables provided in the KID dataset. Using the National Association of Children’s Hospitals and Related Institutions (NACHRI) classification, hospitals were defined as 1) not a children’s hospital, 2) children’s general hospital, 3) children’s specialty hospital, 4) children’s unit in a general hospital. For our analysis, we defined “children’s hospital” as groups 2 or 4. Hospitals were further defined as urban or rural (less than 500 people per square mile), based upon United States Census Bureau data, and teaching or non-teaching based upon the American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database.
The authors conducted all analyses using Stata 12.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX) statistical software. For all analyses, we applied sampling weights provided by the KID  to generate nationally representative estimates. The complex survey design accounts for clustering of data at the hospital level. All results are reported utilizing weighted estimates in each study year. Under the regulations of the University of Michigan Medical Institutional Review Board, as a study of de-identified data this study was exempt from human subjects review.
Survey-weighted logistic regression was performed to assess hospital characteristics associated with LP for EONS, before and after controlling for newborn clinical characteristics and newborn demographics. This analysis was repeated to evaluate payer and hospital region associated with LP for EONS. Records with missing data were excluded from multivariate analyses.
All analyses were repeated separately to include newborns whose length of stay was less than 7 days and 28 days (rather than 21 days as described above). Our results for both analyses were similar to the results we report below, and are therefore not reported separately; they are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Characteristics of newborns with lumbar punctures being performed versus all other newborns in the United States, 2009
Term newborns with LP 13,694
All other term newborns 3,684,437
National Estimated Total
Percent (95% CI)
Percent (95% CI)
First (<40 k, US$)
Second (40–49 k, US$)
Third (50–65 k, US$)
Fourth (>66 k, US$)
Any respiratory diagnosis
Rates of lumbar puncture and meningitis among normal-birth weight neonates
Rates of LPs performed for presumed EONS and meningitis diagnoses per 100,000 term newborns, 2009
LP rate (95% CI)
Meningitis rate (95% CI)
Trends in adjusted odds of lumbar puncture for EONS, 2003–2009
Adjusted and unadjusted odds of lumbar puncture for EONS, by payer, hospital type and region, 2003–2009
Unadjusted OR (95% CI)
Adjusted* OR (95% CI)
Unadjusted OR (95% CI)
Adjusted* OR (95% CI)
Unadjusted OR (95% CI)
Adjusted* OR (95% CI)
Our analysis is the first to describe national variation in performance of LPs for EONS among normal-birth weight infants. These variations are significant and persist even with adjustments for potential confounding factors. Such variations in care indicate inconsistent application of available clinical guidelines, and also suggest broad opportunities for improvement in the delivery of neonatal care related to concerns about infection.
Lumbar punctures are invasive procedures and have been noted to be more difficult to perform in neonates than in other populations and to cause neonatal distress . In this population, complications such as “bloody taps”  and contaminated specimens [5, 6] are common, and therefore limiting a newborn’s exposure to an LP may be desirable. On the other hand, some studies suggest that LPs performed only on newborns with signs of infection lead to missed diagnoses of meningitis and its associated morbidity [7, 8]. Still other studies have found discordance of cerebral spinal fluid and blood cultures in septic patients , suggesting all newborns suspected of EONS should have LPs.
Both the CDC [9, 19] and the AAP  have published guidelines to assist clinicians in the diagnostic evaluation of a newborn suspected of having GBS EONS. Variation in LPs in this analysis suggests that adoption of these guidelines is uneven. While it is impossible to delineate from our findings which group is performing the “clinically appropriate” number of LPs, inconsistency across clinicians practicing in different settings is evident.
Variation in both practice [12, 13] and clinical outcomes [20, 21] among neonatal intensive care units has been described previously. However, no study has exclusively compared children’s hospitals versus non-children’s hospitals when comparing LPs performed on neonates. Our study finds that LPs were done more frequently in children’s hospitals in two of our three study years, even after controlling for confounders. Even with this, it is possible that differences between children’s and non-children’s hospitals found in our study occurred because of unexplained confounding. For example, despite our broad inclusion of clinical diagnoses, it is plausible that newborns admitted to children’s hospitals have more serious or more complex illness, prompting more frequent LPs.
Our study also found some patient-level variables associated with LPs for EONS – in particular, insurance status. In one study year (2006), uninsured newborns were more likely to have LPs performed than those who were privately insured. This is potentially linked to maternal insurance status in the antenatal period. Mothers who are uninsured are less likely to utilize prenatal services , thus less is known about their risks of peripartum infection. In this setting of uncertainty, neonatal providers might be more likely to perform LPs. We also found that newborns with Medicaid were more likely to have an LP for EONS in all study years. In this case, it is possible that insurance status is a proxy for race/ethnicity, because national enrollment data indicate that black and Hispanic children have proportionately higher rates of enrollment in Medicaid . It has been previously described that minority groups are disproportionately affected by GBS EONS [10, 19], therefore leading to the possibility that they were more likely to undergo LPs to evaluate for the condition.
Our study found geographic variation in the practice of performing LPs for EONS, with the Northeast having a statistically significant higher rate of LPs performed in 2003 and 2006, and a trend to more LPs in 2009. While no prior study has evaluated geographic variation in the practice of LPs for EONS, previous analyses have found geographic differences in other procedures such as placement of intracranial pressure monitors  and tracheostomy . Such regional variation may reflect variation in pediatrician and/or neonatologist training or differences in epidemiologic patterns that influence clinicians’ perception of EONS risk.
Our study finds that more LPs sometimes led to more diagnoses of meningitis. As an example, newborns enrolled in state Medicaid programs were more likely than privately insured infants to have an LP performed and were more likely to have a diagnosis of meningitis. This finding also occurred in urban and teaching hospitals. In contrast, our study found that LPs were more commonly performed in the Northeast with no difference noted in the diagnosis of meningitis among the four census regions. One would expect that more LPs would lead to more diagnoses of meningitis; however, this finding was not consistent, suggesting the possibility that excess LPs are being performed. This inconsistency merits further study.
In fall of 2010, the CDC released updated guidelines for the diagnostic evaluation of newborns at risk of GBS EONS. The guidelines clarify that only a limited evaluation (blood culture and empiric antibiotics) should be completed for a newborn without signs of sepsis whose mother is diagnosed with chorioamnionitis (no LP). Additionally, it recommends observation for term newborns who are well-appearing without prolonged rupture of membranes (even if their mothers met criteria for intrapartum antibiotics and they were not received), potentially limiting antibiotic use in this group . The introduction of these new recommendations and the clarifications in the treatment algorithm provided in the guidelines might lead to more standard care and ensure LPs are performed judiciously.
There are limitations to our study common to analyses of secondary data. Our study utilized a nationally representative administrative dataset, which relies on hospital discharge abstracts. The use of these data allows for nationally representative inferences, but administrative data are subject to errors of omission and commission related to coding discrepancies. We did not have access to medical records for these patients that would have allowed us to validate the codes. Because race was missing in approximately one-quarter of our data, we were not able to evaluate the potential impact of race on our primary outcome, an important limitation.
In addition, discharge abstracts do not contain admitting diagnoses. Final billing diagnoses may not fully reflect clinical conditions or co morbidities present at the time of birth that may have influenced clinical decisions such as LPs. On the other hand, discharge abstracts likely reflect conditions most relevant to the clinical course of the infants. KID data are available at the encounter level rather than the patient level; therefore, we are unable to evaluate readmissions to look for possible missed cases of meningitis.
Caring for a neonate suspected of having EONS can be a diagnostic dilemma for clinicians, given that presenting signs can be largely subjective. In this national analysis, we found pronounced institutional variation in LPs performed for EONS, even when adjusting for hospital differences and clinical conditions that would prompt LPs. Our findings prompt calls for further standardization, limiting unnecessary procedures for newborns.
The authors would like to thank the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation for their support of this work.
Early onset neonatal sepsis
American Academy of Pediatrics
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Group B Streptococcus
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s
Kids’ Inpatient Database
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project
National Association of Children’s Hospitals and Related Institutions.
- Stoll BJ: Epidemiology of Early- and Late-Onset Neonatal Infections, in Kliegman. 2007, Saunders Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA: Nelson Textbook of PediatricsGoogle Scholar
- Johnson CE, Whitwell JK, Pethe K, Saxena K, Super DM: Term newborns who are at risk for sepsis: are lumbar punctures necessary?. Pediatrics. 1997, 99 (4): E10-10.1542/peds.99.4.e10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fielkow S, Reuter S, Gotoff SP: Cerebrospinal fluid examination in symptom-free infants with risk factors for infection. The journal of pediatrics. 1991, 119 (6): 971-973. 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)83058-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ray B, Mangalore J, Harikumar C, Tuladhar A: Is lumbar puncture necessary for evaluation of early neonatal sepsis?. Arch Dis Child. 2006, 91 (12): 1033-1035.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Eldadah M, Frenkel LD, Hiatt IM, Hegyi T: Evaluation of routine lumbar punctures in newborn infants with respiratory distress syndrome. The Pediatric infectious disease journal. 1987, 6 (3): 243-246. 10.1097/00006454-198703000-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weiss MG, Ionides SP, Anderson CL: Meningitis in premature infants with respiratory distress: role of admission lumbar puncture. The journal of pediatrics. 1991, 119 (6): 973-975. 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)83059-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wiswell TE, Baumgart S, Gannon CM, Spitzer AR: No lumbar puncture in the evaluation for early neonatal sepsis: will meningitis be missed?. Pediatrics. 1995, 95 (6): 803-806.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Visser VE, Hall RT: Lumbar puncture in the evaluation of suspected neonatal sepsis. J Pediatr. 1980, 96 (6): 1063-1067. 10.1016/S0022-3476(80)80643-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schrag S, Gorwitz R, Fultz-Butts K, Schuchat A: Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease. Revised guidelines from CDC. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports. 2002, 51 (11): 1-22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stoll BJ, et al: Early Onset Neonatal Sepsis: The Burden of Group B Streptococcal and E. coli Disease Continues Pediatrics. 2011, 125 (5): 817-826.Google Scholar
- Benjamin D, Stoll B: Infection in late preterm infants. Clinics in perinatology. 2006, 33 (4): 871-882. 10.1016/j.clp.2006.09.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McCormick M, Escobar G, Zheng Z, Richardson D: Place of birth and variations in management of late preterm (“near-term”) infants. Seminars in perinatology. 2006, 30 (1): 44-47. 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.01.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kahn D, Richardson D, Billett H: Inter-NICU variation in rates and management of thrombocytopenia among very low birth-weight infants. Journal of Perinatology. 2003, 23 (4): 312-316. 10.1038/sj.jp.7210910.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Introduction to the HCUP Kids’ Inpatient Database (KID) 2006: 2008, Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 1-63.
- Patrick SW, Schumacher RE, Benneyworth BD, Krans EE, McAllister JM, Davis MM: Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome and Associated Health Care Expenditures: United States, 2000–2009. JAMA. 2012, 307 (18): 1934-1940. 10.1001/jama.2012.3951.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nizet V, Klein J: Bacterial Sepsis and Meningitis, in Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn. 2010, Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier SaundersGoogle Scholar
- Schwersenski J, McIntyre L, Bauer CR: Lumbar puncture frequency and cerebrospinal fluid analysis in the neonate. Am J Dis Child. 1991, 145 (1): 54-58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garges HP, et al: Neonatal meningitis: what is the correlation among cerebrospinal fluid cultures, blood cultures, and cerebrospinal fluid parameters?. Pediatrics. 2006, 117 (4): 1094-1100. 10.1542/peds.2005-1132.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verani J, McGee L, Schrag S: Prevention of Perinatal Group B Streptococcal Disease: Revised Guidelines from CDC, 2010, in MMWR. 2010, Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control, 1-36.Google Scholar
- Synnes AR, Chien LY, Peliowski A, Baboolal R, Lee SK: Variations in intraventricular hemorrhage incidence rates among Canadian neonatal intensive care units. The journal of pediatrics. 2001, 138 (4): 525-531. 10.1067/mpd.2001.111822.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vohr BR, et al: Center Differences and Outcomes of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants Pediatrics. 2004, 113 (4): 781-789.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herbst M, Mercer B, Beazley D, Meyer N, Carr T: Relationship of prenatal care and perinatal morbidity in low-birth-weight infants. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2003, 189 (4): 930-933. 10.1067/S0002-9378(03)01055-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, The uninsured, a primer: key facts about Americans without health insurance. 2010, Washington, D.C: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 1-44.Google Scholar
- Odetola F, Tilford J, Davis M: Variation in the use of intracranial-pressure monitoring and mortality in critically ill children with meningitis in the United States. Pediatrics. 2006, 117 (6): 1893-1900. 10.1542/peds.2005-2179.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lewis C, Carron J, Perkins J, Sie KCY, Feudtner C: Tracheotomy in pediatric patients: a national perspective. Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery. 2003, 129 (5): 523-529. 10.1001/archotol.129.5.523.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/12/134/prepub