Can improving working memory prevent academic difficulties? a school based randomised controlled trial
© Roberts et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 15 April 2011
Accepted: 20 June 2011
Published: 20 June 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Apr 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 May 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Jon Quach|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 May 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Jun 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Jon Quach|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|14 Jun 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|16 Jun 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Jon Quach|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|16 Jun 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|20 Jun 2011||Editorially accepted|
|20 Jun 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2431-11-57|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.