Phagocytic ability of neutrophils and monocytes in neonates
© Filias et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 14 October 2010
Accepted: 14 April 2011
Published: 14 April 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|14 Oct 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pascal Lavoie|
|17 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thorsten Orlikowsky|
|19 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Morgan Peltier|
|23 Jan 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Marina Karakantza|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Jan 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Feb 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thorsten Orlikowsky|
|28 Feb 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Morgan Peltier|
|1 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pascal Lavoie|
|13 Mar 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Marina Karakantza|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Mar 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Mar 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Marina Karakantza|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|24 Mar 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Apr 2011||Editorially accepted|
|14 Apr 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2431-11-29|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.