Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Determinants of survival in very low birth weight neonates in a public sector hospital in Johannesburg

BMC Pediatrics201010:30

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-30

Received: 17 December 2009

Accepted: 6 May 2010

Published: 6 May 2010

Abstract

Background

Audit of disease and mortality patterns provides essential information for health budgeting and planning, as well as a benchmark for comparison. Neonatal mortality accounts for about 1/3 of deaths < 5 years of age and very low birth weight (VLBW) mortality for approximately 1/3 of neonatal mortality. Intervention programs must be based on reliable statistics applicable to the local setting; First World data cannot be used in a Third World setting. Many neonatal units participate in the Vermont Oxford Network (VON); limited resources prevent a significant number of large neonatal units from developing countries taking part, hence data from such units is lacking. The purpose of this study was to provide reliable, recent statistics relevant to a developing African country, useful for guiding neonatal interventions in that setting.

Methods

This was a retrospective chart review of 474 VLBW infants admitted within 24 hours of birth, between 1 July 2006 and 30 June 2007, to the neonatal unit of Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH) in Johannesburg, South Africa. Binary outcome logistic regression on individual variables and multiple logistic regression was done to identify those factors determining survival.

Results

Overall survival was 70.5%. Survival of infants below 1001 grams birth weight was 34.9% compared to 85.8% for those between 1001 and 1500 grams at birth. The main determinant of survival was birth weight with an adjusted survival odds ratio of 23.44 (95% CI: 11.22 - 49.00) for babies weighing between 1001 and 1500 grams compared to those weighing below 1001 grams. Other predictors of survival were gender (OR 3. 21; 95% CI 1.6 - 6.3), birth before arrival at the hospital (BBA) (OR 0.23; 95% CI: 0.08 - 0.69), necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) (OR 0.06; 95% CI: 0.02 - 0.20), hypotension (OR 0.05; 95% CI 0.01 - 0.21) and nasal continuous positive airways pressure (NCPAP) (OR 4.58; 95% CI 1.58 - 13.31).

Conclusions

Survival rates compare favourably with other developing countries, but can be improved; especially in infants < 1001 grams birth weight. Resources need to be allocated to preventing the birth of VLBW babies outside hospital, early neonatal resuscitation, provision of NCPAP and prevention of NEC.

Background

The fourth Millennium Development Goal is to reduce the mortality of children under the age of 5 years by two thirds, before the year 2015. Neonatal mortality accounts for 37% of deaths below the age of 5 years and "improved neonatal and maternal care could save the lives of countless newborns" [1]. In the Perinatal Problem Identification Program (PPIP) http://www.ppip.co.za, a self reporting data base that covers about 40% of births in South Africa, the early neonatal mortality rate has been static over the past few years at about 9.5 per 1000 live births [2]. However, the majority of neonatal deaths remain unaudited and the national figure is thus probably higher. Very low birth weight (VLBW) infants represent a vulnerable group of newborns with a high mortality rate. There are many reports of factors affecting early survival of VLBW infants; these are summarized in Table 1[322]. The survival rate of VLBW infants worldwide ranges between 43% in developing countries such as Jamaica [21] to more than 90% in developed countries, such as the Netherlands [7], with an average of about 73% (See Table 1). The mortality rate for VLBW infants in Soweto, Johannesburg, between 2000 and 2002 was reported at 71% [22], which corresponds to developed countries in the mid 1980's (see Table 1).
Table 1

Survival of Very Low Birth Weight infants

Location

Weight (Main inclusion criteria)

Time Period

Number of babies

Survival

Factors associated with survival of babies

Reference

Texas

VLBW

1977

1995

 

50%

81%

Number of babies offered mechanical ventilation; Black females survival advantage

[3]

Israel

VLBW

1985-87

69

70%

 

[4]

Italy

VLBW

ELBW

1987-1988

634

77%

44%

Lower Birth weight or gestational age, Gender, No antenatal steroids, 1 minute Apgar, No spontaneous respiration in delivery room, body temperature/pH on admission

[5]

Malaysia

VLBW

1989-1990

329

40%

Lower birth weight/gestational age

[6]

Netherlands

VLBW

1983

1995

1388

2006

75%

90%

Delivery in tertiary centre, prolonged artificial ventilation, Caesarean delivery

[7]

Taiwan

VLBW

1995-1998

162

78.4%

 

[8]

South America

VLBW

1997-1998

385

(11 neonatal units)

73%

(49-89%)

Birth weight, gestational age, No antenatal steroids, air leaks

[9]

Sofia (Bulgaria)

VLBW

ELBW

1998-1999

122

61

86%

54%

Birth weight, gestational age, low Apgar scores, Cord Ph < 7.1, Need for cardiac compressions/adrenaline in delivery room

[10]

New Zealand

VLBW

1986

1998

413

1084

81%

90.3%

Delivery in tertiary centre, No antenatal steroids

[11]

Thailand

VLBW

ELBW

1996

613

76%

49%

Gestational age, birth weight, delivery room resuscitation, Pneumothorax

[12]

East Anglia (England)

VLBW

1993-1997

1244

75-79%

Gestational age, Birth weight, No antenatal steroids

[13]

USA (NICHD)

VLBW

1995-1996

1997-2002

 

84%

85%

 

[14]

Turkey

VLBW

1997-2002

122

84%

Birth Weight

[15]

Spain

VLBW

2002

2005

8942

80.6%

84.8%

Outborn, birthweight

[16]

India

VLBW

3 years (not stated)

260

63%

Birth weight, gestational age, maternal bleed, 1 minute Apgar, apnoea, neonatal septicaemia, shock, hypothermia, no antenatal steroids

[17]

Brazil

VLBW

2004/5

579

(16 tertiary units)

84%

(69-95%)

Gestational age, maternal hypertension, 5 minute Apgar, respiratory distress, place of birth

[18]

Malaysia

VLBW

1993

2003

69

60

62,3%

81,6%

 

[19]

Thailand

VLBW

ELBW

2002/3

78

81%

52%

Birth weight, gestational age, congenital anomalies, No antenatal steroids, 5 minute Apgar, intubation in delivery room, respiratory distress syndrome

[20]

Jamaica

ELBW

2002/3

47

43%

Gestational age, birth weight, gender, No antenatal steroids, Caesarean delivery

[21]

South Africa

VLBW

ELBW

2000-2002

2164

71%

32%

Birth weight, 1 & 5 minute Apgars, Caesarean delivery, antenatal care, gender

[22]

VLBW = Very low birth weight (< 1501 grams) ELBW = extremely low birth weight (< 1001 grams)

There has been steady improvement in the overall early survival of VLBW infants over time (see Table 1) e.g. from 50% in 1977 to 81% in 1995 in Texas [3] and from 81% in 1986 to 90.3% in 1998 in New Zealand [11]. Malaysia, a developing country, showed a similar improvement from 62% in 1993 to 81.6% in 2003 [19]. The degree of improvement, however, is less marked in more recent years - the NICHD showed almost no improvement in early VLBW survival between 1995/6 (84%) and 1997 - 2002 (85%) [14].

Audit of neonatal care by participating in a database such as the Vermont Oxford network (VON) http://www.vtoxford.org assists quality control provides a benchmark for comparison and opportunities for research and collaboration with other neonatal units. In developing countries with busy, under-resourced neonatal units, participation in the VON is difficult as it requires appropriate information systems and additional dedicated staff members. There is therefore a lack of current, valid statistics from such units, even though large numbers of patients are treated annually. It is essential to have this information to guide forward planning for therapeutic interventions, budgeting and staffing, with the aim of improving outcome. Local data relevant to a developing country is essential to facilitate this planning; it is not possible to transpose data from one area to another.

The purpose of this study was to review the survival to hospital discharge and morbidity of VLBW infants at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH), a busy neonatal unit in a developing country.

Methods

This was a retrospective record review of all neonates with a birth weight < 1501 grams admitted to the neonatal unit of CMJAH within 24 hours of birth from 1 July 2006 to 31 June 2007. All inborn neonates were admitted directly to a labour ward nursery, so statistics included inborn babies who died shortly after birth. VLBW babies who were delivered at outlying primary level hospitals or clinics and those who were born before arrival in hospital (BBA) were also admitted to the neonatal unit. Data was entered from hospital records onto a Microsoft Access (2003) database. Maternal information obtained from the delivery records included age, parity, gravidity, antenatal care, administration of antenatal steroids, syphilis screening and treatment, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening and prophylaxis, place of delivery, fetal presentation and mode of delivery. HIV screening followed a protocol of voluntary counseling and testing; mothers could refuse to be tested. Prophylaxis was only given to infants where mothers were proven to be HIV positive. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing to confirm HIV infection in the neonate was only done from 6 weeks of chronological age. Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission was not determined by HIV exposure.

The baby's weight, Apgar scores and details of delivery room resuscitation were also obtained from the delivery records. Gestational age was determined from a combination of maternal history (expected date of delivery, height of fundus, first trimester ultrasound) and the Ballard score, which was done by attending clinical staff. The birth weight was plotted on Fenton [23] growth charts to determine whether the baby was appropriate for gestational age (AGA), small for gestational age (SGA) or large for gestational age (LGA). Information was available on all patients until hospital discharge. Neonatal records were reviewed by the primary author (DEB) and the final diagnoses assigned by the attending clinical staff were confirmed using the available clinical information and results of investigations. The neonatal information included duration of hospital stay, respiratory diagnosis (including hyaline membrane disease (HMD)), duration of oxygen therapy, pneumothorax, neonatal jaundice (NNJ), phototherapy, exchange transfusion, patent ductus arteriousus (PDA) and treatment, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and management, intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) and grade, periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), hypotension, infection and causative organism blood results, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (defined as oxygen requirement at 28 days of age), congenital anomalies, whether KMC was done and final outcome (discharge or death). IVH was graded according to Papile [24] the diagnosis of NEC was given if the baby had modified Bell's stage 2 or 3 [25]; ROP was diagnosed by an ophthalmologist; PDA was confirmed on echocardiogram by a paediatric cardiologist.

The cause of death was reviewed by the primary author (DEB) and classified according to the PPIP classification http://www.ppip.co.za. The PPIP was established in 1999 in South Africa as a national tool for perinatal death audit. In order to have manageable data, the single most likely cause of death is listed - major categories include prematurity, asphyxia, infection and congenital anomaly. Each category is further subdivided into sub-categories; prematurity is subdivided into extreme immaturity, HMD, IVH, NEC and pulmonary haemorrhage. No postmortem examinations were done on the study patients. Details of ICU admissions include indication for ventilation, dates and type of ventilatory support, (IPPV or NCPAP) and surfactant therapy. Babies who received both NCPAP and IPPV were classified as needing ventilator assistance for the purposes of analysis.

Babies were managed according to the unit policies at the time. Ventilatory support was offered to babies above 900 grams birth weight, due to severely limited tertiary resources. Babies were not routinely intubated or given NCPAP in the delivery room; ventilatory support (including NCPAP) was commenced when the infant showed signs of respiratory failure. All babies, irrespective of birth weight, were provided with standard neonatal care (nursed in an incubator, given supplemental oxygen, intravenous fluids, antibiotic therapy, blood transfusion, phototherapy as needed and KMC). Surfactant therapy was only given as rescue therapy to babies on ventilatory support, usually to those patients who did not wean rapidly from supplementary oxygen. A second dose of surfactant could be given if the baby had responded to the initial dose and then deteriorated again. NCPAP was introduced to the neonatal unit March 2006. During the period of the study, there was no rooming in facility, so mothers could only do KMC intermittently during the day. KMC was introduced once a baby was in room air and tolerating full enteral feeds. Cranial ultrasound was done during the first week of life by a paediatric neurologist and, if indicated, repeated after 1 to 2 weeks and just prior to discharge. Babies who died within the first 72 hours may not have undergone a cranial ultrasound. Screening for retinopathy of prematurity was done by an ophthalmologist at 36 weeks post conceptional age. If babies were discharged prior to this age, an outpatient appointment was booked for the ophthalmology clinic. Babies were discharged home once they had established enteral feeds, were off supplemental oxygen, maintaining temperature and had achieved a weight of 1600 grams. Some babies were discharged to regional step down facilities for weight gain, close to the time of discharge home.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was done on a personal computer using SPSS version 17 (SPSS Inc. http://www.spss.com). Continuous variables were summarised using mean and 95% confidence intervals, while categorical variables were summarised as ratios and percentages. For the purposes of analysis, babies transferred out and those discharged home directly were combined as "survivors" and compared to those babies that died during their hospital admission. Cross-tabulations of categorical variables with survival were produced and statistical associations between these categorical variables and survival outcome were done using the Chi-Square test of association. Normally distributed continuous variables were compared using the unpaired t test and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare discrete variables and those continuous variables that were not normally distributed. Binary outcome logistic regression was done on individual variables to predict survival. Those variables which were significant at the univariate analysis were entered into a multiple logistic regression using the backward selection procedure. All the statistical tests were conducted at 5% significance level.

Ethics

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of the Witwatersrand for research on human subjects.

Results

Among the four hundred and eighty eight eligible VLBW babies who were admitted during the study period, 474 records (97.1%) of VLBW babies born to 448 mothers were retrieved and available for review.

The overall survival was 334/474 (70.5%). The mean birth weight was 1133.5 grams (95% CI 1111.9 - 1155 .0), mean gestational age was 29.9 weeks (95% CI 29.6 - 30.1) and mean duration of hospitalisation was 25.8 days (95% CI 23.8 - 27.8). The mean age at time of death was 5.77 days (95% CI 3.66 - 7.88) and of discharge/transfer was 34.23 days (95% CI 32.13 - 36.32). The mean duration of supplemental oxygen was 8.2 days (95% CI 6.8 - 9.7) and mean duration of mechanical ventilation was 8.08 days (95% CI 6.15 - 10.01).

Birth weight and gestational age

The mean birth weight of survivors (1213 grams; 95% CI: 1192.5 - 1234.1) was significantly greater (p < 0.001) than that for babies that died (942.5 grams; 95% CI: 904.5 - 980.5). The mean gestation period for survivors (30.7 weeks, 95% CI: 30.4 - 31.0) was significantly more advanced than that of those who died (27.6 weeks, 95% CI: 27.2 - 28.1). The median 5 minute Apgar score of those babies that survived, 8 (IQR: 1-9) was significantly higher than the non survivors, 6 (IQR: 1-10) with p = 0.005. Mortality by birth weight category is shown in figure 1. As survival seem to increase with birth weight, an association between a quadratic term was fitted which also showed significant association (p=0.010) with survival.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2431-10-30/MediaObjects/12887_2009_Article_342_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Survival by birthweight category.

Survival was closely related to birth weight category - ranging from zero below 601 grams to 62% (32/52) from 901 to 1000 grams and 93% (67/72) from 1301 to 1500 grams. The survival of extremely low birth weight infants (< 1001 grams) was 34.9% (50/143) compared to 85.8% (284/331) for babies with a birth weight from 1001 to 1500 grams. The adjusted survival odds ratio was 23.44 (95% CI: 11.22 - 49.00) for babies weighing from 1001 to 1500 grams compared to those weighing below 1001 grams.

The main cause of death according to the PIPP classification is shown in Table 2. The single most common cause of death was extreme multi-organ immaturity, in 40% of cases, followed by HMD in 15% of cases.
Table 2

PPIP classification of mortality

Cause of death

Cases

%

Extreme mulitorgan immaturity

56

40

HMD

22

15.7

Asphyxia

17

12.1

NEC

14

10

Nosocomial sepsis

14

10

Septicaemia

3

2.1

Congenital infection

2

1.4

IVH

3

2.1

Congenital abnormality

4

2.8

Pulmonary Haemorrhage

2

1.4

Unspecified

3

2.1

Maternal and delivery period

The mean maternal age was 26.5 years (95% CI: 25.8 - 27.1) and 37.3% (152/407) were primiparous. Risk factors for mortality related to antenatal care, labour and delivery are presented in Table 3. Emergency Caesarean section (CS) was done for fetal distress in 63/229 (27.5%) of cases. Where emergency CS was done for maternal indications, the most common reasons were pregnancy induced hypertension 45.6% (63/138) followed by ante partum haemorrhage in 13% (18/138). No CS was done for HIV infection alone.
Table 3

Obstetric related risk factors and prediction of mortality

Variable (Valid cases)

 

Category total

Survived (%)

Died (%)

P value

Odds ratio

95% CI of OR

SGA (461)

Yes

178

143 (80)

35 (20)

0.001

2.07

1.32 - 3.22

 

No

283

188 (66)

95 (34)

   

Gender (470)

Female

251

192 (76.5)

59 (23.5)

0.004

1.8

1.24 - 2.69

 

Male

219

141 (64.4)

78 (35.6)

   

Antenatal care (474)

Yes

256

197 (77)

59 (23)

0.001

1.97

1.32 - 2.95

 

No

218

137 (63)

81 (37)

   

Antenatal corticosteroids (474)

Given

173

131 (75.4)

42 (24.3)

0.057

1.51

0.99 - 2.30

 

Not given

301

203 (67.4)

98 (32.6)

   

HIV exposed (328)

Yes

120

84 (70)

36 (30)

0.057

0.61

0.36 - 1.02

 

No

208

165 (80)

43 (21)

   

Syphilis Exposed (474)

Yes

12

7 (58.4)

5 (42)

0.351

0.58

0.18 - 1.85

 

No

462

327 (71)

135 (29)

   

Place of birth (470)

    

< 0.001

  
 

Inborn

383

286 (74.7)

97 (25.3)

 

1

 
 

BBA

51

20 (39)

31 (61)

 

0.22

0.12 - 0.40

 

Out born

36

24 (66)

12 (33)

 

0.68

0.33 - 1.41

Mode of delivery (464)

    

< 0.001

  
 

NVD

197

123 (62.4)

74 (37.6)

 

1

 
 

Vaginal Breech

25

13 (52)

12 (48)

 

0.65

0.28 - 1.50

 

Elective CS

12

9 (75)

3 (25)

 

1.80

0.47 - 6.88

 

Emergency CS

229

182 (79.5)

47 (20.5)

 

2.33

1.51 - 3.59

Presentation (448)

Vertex

401

290 (72.3)

111 (27.7)

0.541

0.82

0.43 - 1.57

 

Breech

47

32 (68.11)

15 (31.9)

   

Resuscitation at birth (474)

Yes

154

91 (59.1)

63 (40.9)

< 0.001

0.46

0.30 - 0.69

 

No

320

243 (75.9)

77 (24.1)

   

Hypothermia at birth (474)

Yes

13

5 (38.5)

8 (61.5)

0.01

0.25

0.08 - 0.78

 

No

461

329 (71.4)

132 (28.6)

   

5 minute APGAR Score (409)

Score >= 6

304

231 (76)

73 (24)

0.093

1.52

0.93 - 2.46

 

Score < 6

105

71 (67.6)

34 (32.4)

   

Note: Valid cases = those with no missing data, thus, a complete case analysis

Percentages are reported for rows

Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals are presented for each risk factor. Significant predictors of survival on univariate analysis were size for gestational age, gender, antenatal care, place of delivery, mode of delivery, the need for delivery room resuscitation and hypothermia at birth. Maternal HIV exposure, maternal infection with syphilis, the administration of antenatal steroids and the presenting part at delivery did not predict survival. Only 69% of mothers had known HIV status and 36.5% of mothers had received antenatal steroids.

Neonatal period

Air leak was recorded in 3 patients (0.6%) and high frequency ventilation was used in 3 patients (0.6%). These variables were not included in the analysis due to small numbers. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (defined as oxygen requirement > 28 days) was present in 42 (8.8%) of babies. Nevirapine prophylaxis was given to 97/120 (80.8%) of the HIV exposed infants; 25/354 (7%) of mothers offered HIV testing refused consent. 11/474 (2.3%) of the babies were put up for adoption. Only 87 (18.3%) of the babies were screened for ROP prior to discharge-only two babies had ROP, both of which were stage 1. KMC was done by 211/474 (44.5%) of mothers.

Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for each risk factor related to the neonatal period (both disease and treatment) are shown in Table 4. HMD, NCPAP, surfactant therapy, hypotension, NEC and IVH were all predictive of survival. The need for mechanical ventilation, PDA and the presence of sepsis did not predict survival.
Table 4

Risk factors for mortality related to disease/treatment in the neonatal period

Risk factor (Valid cases)

 

Total

Survived (%)

Died (%)

P Value

Odds ratio

95% CI of Odds Ratio

HMD (437)

Yes

299

190 (63.5)

109 (36.5)

< 0.001

0.33

0.20 - 0.55

 

No

138

116 (84.1)

22 (15.9)

   

Mechanical ventilation (474)

Yes

99

71 (71.7)

28 (28.3)

0.76

1.08

0.66 - 1.76

 

No

375

263 (70.1)

112 (29.9)

   

Nasal CPAP (474)

Yes

96

80 (83.3)

16 (16.7)

0.002

2.44

1.37 - 4.35

 

No

378

254 (67.2)

124 (32.8)

   

Surfactant therapy (474)

Yes

90

73 (81)

17 (19)

0.014

2.02

1.15 - 3.58

 

No

384

261 (68)

123 (32)

   

Sepsis (445)

Yes

62

40 (64.5)

22 (35.5)

0.085

0.61

0.34 - 1.08

 

No

383

287 (74.9)

96 (25.1)

   

Gram Negative (474)

Yes

37

21 (56.8)

16 (43.2)

0.057

0.52

0.26 - 1.03

 

No

437

313 (71.6)

124 (28.4)

   

Gram Positive (474)

Yes

28

23 (82.1)

5 (17.9)

0.163

1.99

0.74 - 5.36

 

No

446

311 (69.7)

135 (30.3)

   

PDA (474)

Yes

26

18 (69)

8 (31)

0.887

0.94

0.4 - 2.21

 

No

448

316 (71)

132 (29)

   

Hypotension (474)

Yes

23

7 (30)

16 (70)

< 0.001

0.166

0.07 - 0.41

 

No

451

327 (73)

124 (27)

   

NEC grade 2/3 (474)

Yes

26

9 (35)

17 (65)

< 0.001

0.2

0.09 - 0.46

 

No

448

325 (73)

123 (27)

   

IVH (328)

    

0.004

  
 

No

253

209 (83)

44 (17)

 

1

 
 

Gr 1

11

8 (72.7)

3 (27.3)

 

0.56

0.14 - 2.20

 

Gr 2

40

25 (62.5)

15 (37.5)

 

0.35

0.17 - 0.72

 

Gr 3

16

12 (75)

4 (25)

 

0.63

0.19 - 2.05

 

Gr 4

4

1 (25)

3 (75)

 

0.07

0.01 - 0.69

 

PVL

4

2 (50)

2 (50)

 

0.21

0.03 - 1.53

Note: Valid cases = those with no missing data

Percentages are reported for rows

Multivariate analysis

Multivariate logistic regression is shown in Table 5 for complete cases i.e. a complete case analysis with the entered variables defining a complete case. Variables entered into the model included birth weight, SGA, gender, antenatal care, place of birth, mode of delivery, NEC grade 2/3, hypotension, HMD, resuscitation at birth, hypothermia, surfactant therapy and NCPAP. Gestational age was not included in the model as it is highly correlated with birth weight (correlation coefficient 0.717 p < 0.001) and birth weight is more accurate in our setting than estimation of gestational age. IVH was not included due to the large number of missing variables. The final model showed that birth weight, gender, resuscitation at birth, BBA, hypotension, definite NEC and provision of NCPAP were significant predictors of mortality in this population. The model predicted mortality correctly in 87% of cases. Birth weight was the single most important predictor of mortality, correctly predicting mortality in 82.9% of cases. The odds ratio for death for birth weight ≤ 1001 grams was 10.41 (95% CI 6.62 to 16.6) and for gestational age< 28 weeks was 11.97 (95% CI 7.1 - 20.1).
Table 5

Multivariate logistic regression analysis with adjusted estimates of Odds Ratio (95% CI).

Variable

Odds Ratio

95% Confidence Interval

P-Value

Birth Weight

1.008

1.006 - 1.01

< 0.001

Gender

   

Male

1.00

  

Female

3.21

1.6 - 6.31

0.001

Place of Birth

   

Inborn

1.00

  

BBA

0.23

0.08 - 0.69

0.008

Out born

0.35

0.10 - 1.20

0.096

Resuscitation

   

No

1.00

  

Yes

0.47

0.24 - 0.92

0.029

Nasal CPAP

   

No

1.00

  

Yes

4.58

1.58 - 13.31

0.005

Hypotension

   

No

1.00

  

Yes

0.05

0.01 - 0.21

< 0.001

NEC Grade 2/3

   

No

1.00

  

Yes

0.06

0.02 - 0.20

< 0.001

Discussion

This retrospective review provides current survival rates and indicates where resources should be channeled in order to improve survival of VLBW infants in South Africa. The overall survival rate was 70.5% for VLBW infants at CMJAH 2006/2007. This is almost exactly the same as that reported from CH Baragwanath for 2000 - 2002 (71%), [22] which reflects the similarity in practice and disease profile between the two units, which form part of a single academic complex. This survival rate also compares favorably with the global average of 73% (see Table 1), but is substantially below that of developed countries [7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16]. The survival of ELBW infants in the present review of 35% was less than that in other developing countries, such as Jamaica [21] and Thailand [20] but once again very similar to that of CH Baragwanath (32%) [22]. The most significant cause of death in this study was extremely low birth weight/extreme multi-organ immaturity. This is in close agreement with national data for South Africa from the same time period - 46% of all neonatal deaths were immaturity related, of which 44.9% were due to extreme immaturity and 35.6% due to HMD [26].

The main determinants of survival in the present study - birth weight, gender, being born before arrival in the hospital, resuscitation at birth, NEC, hypotension and NCPAP are not surprising and very similar to other reports on VLBW outcome [57, 922]. However, the study shows that, despite great improvements in neonatal care, the VLBW survival in South Africa is below that in other developing countries [8, 9, 12, 15, 18, 20] and can improve substantially. This can be achieved by simple interventions such as ensuring preterm infants are delivered in hospital, improved neonatal resuscitation and provision of NCPAP. A provincial neonatal resuscitation programme has recently been introduced to improve the resuscitation skill of birth attendants. Patient education as to when to seek help during labour and improved emergency transport will be required to prevent preterm infant BBA. Although provision of antenatal steroids did not achieve statistical significance in this study, the number of women receiving antenatal steroids is unacceptably low (36%). This is a specific obstetric intervention that needs to be addressed and will improve neonatal outcome. Delivery by CS was advantageous, but may reflect those patients who have received antenatal care, including antenatal steroids and who delivered in hospital. It is not feasible to do elective CS on all preterm deliveries in our resource constrained setting.

South Africa is a developing country with limited health resources and high patient numbers; it is not possible to provide full tertiary support to every VLBW infant. For many years this problem has been addressed by limiting ventilatory support, including the administration of surfactant and NCPAP, to those neonates above a specified birth weight cut off. Prior to the widespread use of NCPAP, this cut off was 1000 grams. The ventilation cut off was reduced to 900 grams just before the study period, with the introduction of NCPAP to the unit. The poor survival or our ELBW infants is undoubtedly influenced by this policy and NCPAP with surfactant should be provided to babies from 750 grams in order to bring our ELBW survival rate up to that in other developing countries [12, 20, 21].

NEC and hypotension were the other significant predictors of mortality. The overall rate of NEC was 5.5%, which accounted for 10% of the deaths. Interestingly the rate of NEC was comparable to that in the VON in 2005, which represents well resourced settings. Prevention of NEC should also be a priority, including promotion of breastfeeding. Our rate of breastfeeding at the time of the study was extremely low, mainly due to the HIV epidemic. Only 69% of mothers were tested for HIV, but 36% were positive. The protocol during the study period was to formula feed HIV exposed babies. Of concern, is the high rate of untested mothers, the relatively high rate of refusal to be tested and failure to administer HIV prophylaxis in 16.4% of exposed mothers; this may reflect the mothers who were diagnosed after the early neonatal period. Ensuring that all mothers are counseled and tested for HIV is essential to prevent mother to child transmission and, in turn, facilitate the promotion of breastfeeding and reduction of NEC. Although 36% of screened mothers were HIV positive, HIV status did not predict neonatal outcome. This is in agreement with a study from Durban [27] which found that HIV exposed babies were not different from HIV unexposed neonates with regard to birth weight, gestational age, need for ICU admission, complications of ventilation, sepsis, IVH or death. Furthermore, most HIV exposed neonates are subsequently uninfected. HIV exposure is not a major determinant of neonatal survival and is not used as a criterion for ICU admission.

CMJAH represents a high risk obstetric population with many referrals for obstetric complications, the most frequent of which is pregnancy induced hypertension. Improved management of this obstetric complication may reduce the number of VLBW infants. There are also significant social problems with 2.6% of the babies delivered as a result of illegal termination of pregnancy and 2.3% being given up for adoption. The whole issue of preventing unwanted pregnancy is also pertinent in our population.

The low rate of in hospital screening for ROP is also an area of concern and needs to be improved. A significant number of babies are referred to the ophthalmologist at the time of their first follow up visit for ROP screening, but this may be too late in terms of adequate intervention.

Conclusion

Although the overall survival of VLBW infants in our unit compares with the global average (see Table 1), the survival of our ELBW infants can be significantly improved. NCPAP and surfactant should be provided to ELBW infants > 750 grams birth weight. Prevention of VLBW deliveries outside the hospital, improved administration of antenatal steroids, universal screening for HIV, improved neonatal resuscitation and strategies to prevent NEC, will also improve the VLBW survival rate.

Limitations of the study

The biggest limitation of this study is the retrospective design- this is inevitably complicated by incomplete data, lost records and diagnoses provided by different caregivers. Unfortunately, the ideal prospective collection of data by designated study personnel is extremely difficult in a developing country with limited resources (both money and manpower) where the emphasis is on service delivery.

Abbreviations

AGA: 

appropriate for gestational age

BBA: 

born before arrival at the hospital

BPD: 

bronchopulmonary dysplasia

CH: 

Chris Hani

CMJAH: 

Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital

CS: 

Caesarean section

HIV: 

human immunodeficiency virus

HMD: 

hyaline membrane disease

IPPV: 

intermittent positive pressure ventilation

ICU: 

intensive care unit

IVH: 

intraventricular haemorrhage

LGA: 

large for gestational age

NEC: 

necrotising enterocolitis

NIHCD: 

National Institute of child health and development

NCPAP: 

nasal continuous positive airways pressure

PDA: 

patent ductus arteriousus

PVL: 

periventricular leukomalacia

ROP: 

retinopathy of prematurity

SGA: 

small for gestational age

VLBW: 

very low birth weight

VON: 

Vermont Oxford Network.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge and thank Dr Cheryl Mackay, for her review and comments on the manuscript and Prof Jacky Galpin for initial assistance with the statistical analysis. The statistical analysis was partly funded from a grant from the Medical Research Council of South Africa.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Paediatrics, University of the Witwatersrand Medical School
(2)
Epidemiology and Biostatistics Division, School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand Medical School

References

  1. United Nations: Reduce Child Mortality. The Millennium Development Goals Report New York. 2008, 21-3.Google Scholar
  2. Patrick ME: Neonatal deaths: Do they count?. Saving Children 2006: A survey of child healthcare in South Africa. Edited by: Stephen CRPM. 2008, Pretoria: University of Pretoria, MRC, CDC, 81-5.Google Scholar
  3. Kaiser JR, Tilford JM, Simpson PM, Salhab WA, Rosenfeld CR: Hospital survival of very-low-birth-weight neonates from 1977 to 2000. J Perinatol. 2004, 24: 343-50. 10.1038/sj.jp.7211113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Litt R, Seidman DS, Gross-Tsur V, Dollberg S, Gale R: A 2-year prospective study of very low birth weight infants. Isr J Med Sci. 1992, 28: 783-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. de Vonderweid U, Carta A, Chiandotto V, Chiappe F, Chiappe S, Colarizi P, et al: Italian Multicenter Study on Very Low Birth Weight Babies. Ann IST Super Sanita. 1991, 27: 633-50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Boo NY: Outcome of very low birth weight neonates in a developing country: experience from a large Malaysian maternity hospital. Singapore Med J. 1992, 33: 33-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Anthony S, Ouden L, Brand R, Verloove-Vanhorick P, Gravenhorst JB: Changes in perinatal care and survival in very preterm and extremely preterm infants in The Netherlands between 1983 and 1995. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004, 112: 170-7. 10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00328-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang SC, Lin CH, Lin YJ, Yeh TF: Mortality, morbidity, length and cost of hospitalization in very-low-birth-weight infants in the era of National Health Insurance in Taiwan: a medical center's experience. Acta Paediatr Taiwan. 2000, 41: 308-12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Grupo Colaborativo Neocosur: Very-low-birth-weight infant outcomes in 11 South American NICUs. J Perinatol. 2002, 22: 2-7. 10.1038/sj.jp.7210591.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Vakrilova L, Kalaidzhieva M, Sluncheva B, Popivanova A, Metodieva V, Garnizov T: [Resuscitation in very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight newborns in the delivery room]. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2002, 41: 18-23.Google Scholar
  11. Darlow BA, Cust AE, Donoghue DA: Improved outcomes for very low birth weight infants: evidence from New Zealand national population based data. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003, 88: F23-F28. 10.1136/fn.88.1.F23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Tsou KI, Tsao PN: The morbidity and survival of very-low-birth-weight infants in Taiwan. Acta Paediatr Taiwan. 2003, 44: 349-55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dorling J, D'Amore A, Salt A, Seward A, Kaptoge S, Halliday S, et al: Data collection from very low birth weight infants in a geographical region: methods, costs, and trends in mortality, admission rates, and resource utilisation over a five-year period. Early Hum Dev. 2006, 82: 117-24. 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.10.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fanaroff AA, Stoll BJ, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA, Stark AR, et al: Trends in neonatal morbidity and mortality for very low birth weight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007, 196: 147-8. 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.09.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Atasay B, Gunlemez A, Unal S, Arsan S: Outcomes of very low birth weight infants in a newborn tertiary center in Turkey, 1997-2000. Tur J Pediatra. 2003, 45: 283-9.Google Scholar
  16. Moro M, Figueras-Aloy J, Fernandez C, Domenech E, Jimenez R, Perez-Rodriguez J, et al: Mortality for newborns of birth weight less than 1500 g in Spanish neonatal units (2002-2005). Am J Perinatol. 2007, 24: 593-601. 10.1055/s-2007-992175.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Basu S, Rathore P, Bhatia BD: Predictors of mortality in very low birth weight neonates in India. Singapore Med J. 2008, 49: 556-60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. de Almeida MF, Guinsburg R, Martinez FE, Procianoy RS, Leone CR, Marba ST, et al: Perinatal factors associated with early deaths of preterm infants born in Brazilian Network on Neonatal Research centers. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008, 84: 300-7.Google Scholar
  19. Ho JJ, Chang AS: Changes in the process of care and outcome over a 10-year period in a neonatal nursery in a developing country. J Trop Pediatr. 2007, 53: 232-7. 10.1093/tropej/fmm050.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sritipsukho S, Suarod T, Sritipsukho P: Survival and outcome of very low birth weight infants born in a university hospital with level II NICU. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007, 90: 1323-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Trotman H, Bell Y: Neonatal sepsis in very low birth weight infants at the University Hospital of the West Indies. West Indian Med J. 2006, 55: 165-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Velaphi SC, Mokhachane M, Mphahlele RM, Beckh-Arnold E, Kuwanda ML, Cooper PA: Survival of very-low-birth-weight infants according to birth weight and gestational age in a public hospital. S Afr Med J. 2005, 95: 504-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fenton TR: A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda's chart updated with recent data and a new format. BMC Pediatr. 2003, 3: 13-10.1186/1471-2431-3-13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H: Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr. 1978, 92: 529-534. 10.1016/S0022-3476(78)80282-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Feigin RD, Keating JP, Marshall R, Barton L, et al: Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging. Ann Surg. 1978, 187: 1-7. 10.1097/00000658-197801000-00001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Saving babies 2006 - 2007: Sixth perinatal care survey of South Africa. Edited by: Pattinson RC. 2009, Tshepesa Press, Pretoria
  27. Adhikhari M, Jeena P, Pillay T, Moodley A, Kiepiela P, Cassol S: The HIV-1 exposed neonate: Outcome of intensive care management in the first week of life. Indian Paediatrics. 2005, 42: 1215-1219.Google Scholar
  28. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/10/30/prepub

Copyright

© Ballot et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.