Open Access

Prevalence and predictors of 6-month exclusive breastfeeding among Canadian women: a national survey

BMC PediatricsBMC series ¿ open, inclusive and trusted201010:20

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-20

Received: 8 July 2009

Accepted: 8 April 2010

Published: 8 April 2010

Abstract

Background

In spite of the evidence supporting the importance of breastfeeding during the first year of life, data on breastfeeding practices remain limited in Canada. The study aimed to examine the prevalence and predictors of 6-month exclusive breastfeeding among Canadian women.

Methods

The analysis was based on the Maternity Experience Survey targeting women aged ≥ 15 years who had singleton live births between February 2006 - May 2006 in the Canadian provinces and November 2005 - February 2006 in the territories. The main outcome was exclusive breastfeeding based on the World Health Organization definition. Socioeconomic, demographic, maternal, pregnancy and delivery related variables were considered for a multivariate logistic regression using stepwise modeling. Bootstrapping was performed to account for the complex sampling design.

Results

The sample size in this study was 5,615 weighted to represent 66,810 Canadian women. While ever breastfeeding was 90.3%, the 6-month exclusive breastfeeding rate was 13.8%. Based on the regression model, having higher years of education, residing in the Northern territories and Western provinces, living with a partner, having had previous pregnancies, having lower pre-pregnancy body mass index and giving birth at older age were associated with increased likelihood of 6-month exclusive breastfeeding. Moreover, smoking during pregnancy, Caesarean birth, infant's admission to the intensive care unit and maternal employment status before 6 months of infant's age were negatively associated with exclusive breastfeeding. Mothers choosing to deliver at home were more likely to remain exclusively breastfeeding for 6 months (Odds Ratio: 5.29, 95% Confidence Interval: 2.95-9.46).

Conclusions

The 6-month exclusive breastfeeding rate is low in Canada. The study results constitute the basis for designing interventions that aim to bridge the gap between the current practices of breastfeeding and the World Health Organization recommendation.

Background

Epidemiological research provides compelling evidence for the effect of human milk in decreasing the risk of infant mortality and morbidity from acute and chronic diseases [13]. The World Health Organization (WHO) advocates for breastfeeding as the best source of food for optimal infant growth and development. They recommend that infants should be exclusively breastfed, receiving no other foods or liquids besides breast milk, until 6 months of age [4, 5]. Although there is a debate that infants exclusively breastfed for 6 months are subject to energy and micronutrients deficiency (particularly iron and zinc) [6, 7], the Canadian Paediatric Society, Health Canada and Public Health Agency of Canada have adopted the WHO 6-month exclusive breastfeeding recommendation [8].

The prevalence of breastfeeding among women has been shown to vary substantially across the provinces of Canada. The initiation of breastfeeding ranges from 91.1% in Ontario [9] to 85.6% in Alberta [10] and 72% in Quebec [11]. Breastfeeding continuation up to 6 months was reported to be 22.8% in Southwestern Ontario [12], 37.2% in Alberta [10] and 32% in Montérégie, Quebec [13]. The prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 month, however, is much lower. Millar & Maclean (2005) reported that only 17% of women in Canada conform with the 6-month exclusive breastfeeding recommendation of the WHO. Based on the Canadian studies, exclusive breastfeeding was significantly more common among urban residents [14], women with high education [11, 14] and older mothers [11, 14]. Risk factors for early breastfeeding termination were also found to be associated with early hospital discharge, minimal breastfeeding support and receiving advice on formula feeding [9].

Acquiring information on the predictors of breastfeeding may better equip policy makers and public health practitioners in designing programs for at-risk groups and may help to bring the entire population closer to the infant feeding practices recommended by Health Canada and the WHO. In spite of the evidence supporting the importance of breastfeeding during the first year of life and the variety of health outcomes that are related to breastfeeding, data on breastfeeding practices remain limited in Canada. Canadian studies are mostly representative of specific regions/provinces [10, 12, 13, 1517] and specific populations such as teenagers [18], low income mothers [19], female physicians [20] and primipara mothers [21]. To our knowledge, only one nationwide study, using data from 2003, assessed the prevalence and predictors of breastfeeding across the Canadian provinces [14]. The study, however, excluded mothers in the northern territories. It also assessed breastfeeding status within the previous 5 years thereby increasing the chance of recall bias. The study, as well, investigated limited demographic and socio-economic predictors. The present study, however, used data from a recent specialized survey on pre and post delivery experiences among mothers residing in both the Canadian provinces and territories. It aimed to examine the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months and the potential socio-economic, demographic, maternal, pregnancy and delivery related predictors.

Methods

The analysis of this study was based on the Maternity Experience Survey (MES) that was sponsored by Public Health Agency of Canada and conducted by Statistics Canada in 2006. The MES study is the first nationwide survey that assessed pregnancy, delivery and postnatal experiences of mothers and their children. The study sample was selected from the Canadian Census of Population to include women aged ≥ 15 years who had singleton live births between February 15, 2006 and May, 2006 in the provinces of Canada and November 1, 2005 and February 1, 2006 in the territories of Canada. A total of 8,542 Canadian women were selected, out of which 6,421 (75.2%) responded to the survey. The data was collected through telephone interviews using a computer-assisted telephone interview application. Interviews were conducted between the 5th and 14th month after delivery and lasted on average 45 minutes. The majority (96.9%) of the interviews, however, were performed between the 5th and 9th month postpartum. The MES has been previously described in other references [22].

The present study considered the 5615 MES mothers (87.4%) who had babies aged ≥ 6 month at the time of interview. Mothers were weighted to represent 66,810 Canadian women. The main outcome of the study was exclusive breastfeeding based on the WHO definition as the intake of breast milk only without any other drink or food for the first 6 months of infant's age [5]. This outcome was dichotomous (<6 months, ≥ 6 months) and was calculated using information about breastfeeding termination and timing of introduction of liquids, semi-solid and solid foods. Other breastfeeding variables that were considered were, ever breastfeeding assessed by the question "did you breastfeed or try to breastfeed even if only for a short time?" and breastfeeding intention measured by the question "prior to giving birth, did you intend to feed by formula alone, breastfeeding alone or a combination of both?"

A wide range of variables were investigated as potential predictors of exclusive breastfeeding. Socio-economic status, such as maternal years of education, total household income and place of residence, and demographic factors, consisting of immigration status and province of residence, were considered. Information about maternal characteristics including marital status, age at first pregnancy, number of previous pregnancies, age at selected birth, pre-pregnancy maternal body mass index (BMI) and mother's perceived health were also assessed. Furthermore, pregnancy related factors composed of: self reported weight gain during pregnancy, ever taking alcohol during pregnancy, ever smoking during the third trimester of pregnancy, support during pregnancy, mother's reaction to pregnancy, mother's stress level before and during pregnancy, health problems during pregnancy, attendance of prenatal classes, number of prenatal care visits and type of prenatal care provider were explored as well. Finally, delivery related factors (type of delivery, type of birth setting, birth weight, gestational age and baby's admission to neonatal intensive care unit) and postpartum variables (hospitalization of baby, support after birth, work status after birth and postpartum depression) were examined. All the variables, except for mother's stress level and postpartum depression, were directly self-reported by the mother. The mother's stress level was measured through a set of 13 questions that examined the mother's experience of stressful events in the past 12 months before the birth of her selected child. The questions were adapted by Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) from Newton and Hunt's Life Events Inventory [23]. The answers for these questions were categorised as "Yes" or "No". Consequently, the sum of the "Yes" responses was calculated for each mother to represent her stress level [24]. Postpartum depression, on the other hand, was assessed using the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale [25]. The scale consists of 10 items with four response categories scored from 0 to 3, whereby the highest values represent depressed moods. The sum of scores represents the mother's level of postpartum depression [24].

The prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding was estimated through population weights and examined across all the Canadian provinces and territories. At the bivariate level, differences in the proportion of exclusive breastfeeding were assessed among the different levels of each predictor using normalized weights. Chi square tests and odds ratios (OR) using 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were performed for categorical variables. Differences in means and 95% confidence interval estimations were employed for continuous variables. All the independent variables were considered for a multivariate logistic regression analysis using stepwise modeling. Adjusted OR and 95% CI were reported for the final model. To account for the complex sampling design, bootstrapping was performed to calculate the 95% CI estimates. Population weights, normalized weights and bootstrap weights were all created by Statistics Canada and provided with the MES data file. All analyses, in exception to bootstrapping, were conducted using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 17.0). Bootstrapping was performed using the Statistical Analysis Software (SAS, version 9.2). Statistical significance for all analyses was set at alpha <0.05 for a two tailed tests.

Results

Table 1 presents the estimated population and distribution of breastfeeding related outcomes. During pregnancy, around 90% of the women intended to breastfeed their child. Exclusive breastfeeding rates from 1 to 6 months are illustrated in Figure 1. At 1 month, the exclusive breastfeeding rates were 63.6% (95% CI: 62.3%-64.9%). By 3 months, half of the Canadian women were exclusively breastfeeding (50.4%, 95% CI: 48.2%-50.9%). The 6-month exclusive breastfeeding rate was 13.8% (95% CI: 12.9-14.8) while more than half of the women remained breastfeeding at 6 months of infant's age. Figure 2 compares the breastfeeding rates across the Canadian provinces and territories (P-value < 0.001). The Northern Territories and British Columbia demonstrated the highest prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months (21.2% and 19.2%, respectively). The rate in Newfoundland and Labrador and Prince Edward Islands, on the other hand, was the lowest at 6.5%.
Table 1

Estimated frequency distribution of breastfeeding related variables

 

N*

% (95% CI)†

Intention of breastfeeding before child birth

  

   Formula feeding alone

6,610

9.9 (9.2-10.7)

   Breastfeeding alone

49,850

75.0 (73.8-76.1)

   Combination of formula & breastfeeding

10,027

15.1 (14.1-16.1)

Ever breastfeeding

60,309

90.3 (89.6-91.1)

Liquids were first introduced at ≥ 6 months

17,182

25.8 (24.6-27.0)

Solids were first introduced at ≥ 6 months

21,306

31.9 (30.6-33.2)

Breastfeeding termination at ≥ 6 months

35,946

53.9 (52.6-55.2)

Exclusive breastfeeding for ≥ 6 months

9,217

13.8 (12.9-14.8)

* Sample size is estimated using population weights

† 95% CI were calculated using bootstrapping technique

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2431-10-20/MediaObjects/12887_2009_Article_332_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Exclusive breastfeeding rates during the first 6 months of life across the Canadian provinces and territories (2005/06).

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2431-10-20/MediaObjects/12887_2009_Article_332_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Distribution of 6-month exclusive breastfeeding rates across the Canadian provinces and territories (2005/06). Note: P-value < 0.001

Unadjusted associations between exclusive breastfeeding and potential predictors are shown in Table 2. Out of the 30 variables that were considered for stepwise logistic regression, 12 variables were retained in the final model (Table 3). Years of education was the only significant socioeconomic variable (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.05-1.12). Out of the demographic variables tested, province of residence remained in the model. As compared to Eastern Atlantic provinces, the residents of Northern Territories and British Columbia were 3.01 (95% CI: 2.21-4.12) and 1.94 (95% CI: 1.42-2.64), respectively, more likely to exclusively breastfeed for the first 6 months of the infant's life. Mothers with partners, mothers with lower BMI before pregnancy, mothers who had more pregnancies and mothers who had their first pregnancy at an older age also had an increased likelihood of breastfeeding exclusively for 6 months. Furthermore, smoking during pregnancy was negatively associated with exclusive breastfeeding (OR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.36-3.27). Women giving birth at home were 5 times more likely to exclusively breastfeed than those who gave birth at hospitals or clinics. Vaginal delivery was also found to increase the exclusive breastfeeding rates at 6 months by 25% as compared to Caesarean delivery (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.01-1.53). Finally, mothers who had their babies admitted to neonatal intensive care unit after birth and mothers who returned to work within the first 6 postpartum months were less likely to achieve 6-month exclusivity of breastfeeding.
Table 2

Unadjusted associations between 6-month exclusive breastfeeding and potential predictors

 

Sample size

N*

Exclusive breast-feeding

N* (%)

Unadjusted odds ratio

OR (95% CI)†

Household income (Canadian dollar)

   

   <$30,000

908

98 (10.8)

1

   $30,000 to less than $60,000

1,640

194 (11.8)

1.11 (0.84-1.47)

   $60,000 to less than $100,000

1,657

231 (13.9)

1.35 (1.02-1.77)

   ≥ $100,000

1,052

213 (20.2)

2.11 (1.60-2.79)

Place of residence

   

   Rural area

973

129 (13.3)

1

   Urban, population ≤ 499,999

1,976

247 (12.5)

0.93 (0.75-1.17)

   Urban, population ≥ 500,000

2,436

363 (14.9)

1.15 (0.92-1.43)

Immigrant mother

   

   No

4,334

559 (12.9)

1

   Yes

1,239

207 (16.7)

1.36 (1.12-1.64)

Marital status

   

   No partner

473

27 (5.7)

1

   Have a partner

5,105

743 (14.6)

2.79 (1.86-4.18)

Moms perceived health

   

   Excellent/very good

4,022

596 (14.8)

2.11 (1.30-3.43)

   Good

1,274

154 (12.1)

1.67 (0.99-2.80)

   Poor/Fair

304

23 (7.6)

1

Reaction when discovered pregnancy

   

   Very happy/happy

5,184

722 (13.9)

1

   Indifferent

238

27 (11.3)

0.78 (0.50-1.21)

   Very unhappy/Unhappy

164

21 (12.8)

0.89 (0.54-1.48)

Smoking during pregnancy

   

   No

4,982

740 (14.9)

3.15 (2.12-4.68)

   Yes

607

32 (5.3)

1

Alcohol drinking during pregnancy

   

   No

4,982

677 (13.6)

0.82 (0.64-1.06)

   Yes

586

94 (16.0)

1

Health problems during pregnancy

   

   No

4,232

610 (14.4)

1.23 (1.01-1.50)

   Yes

1,365

164 (12.0)

1

Support during pregnancy

   

   None/Little of time

289

37 (12.8)

0.92 (0.61-1.40)

   Some of the time

448

69 (15.4)

1.14 (0.86-1.52)

   Most/All of time

4,846

666 (13.7)

1

Attended prenatal classes

   

   No

3,770

520 (13.8)

1

   Yes

1,830

253 (13.8)

1.00 (0.85-1.18)

Prenatal care provider

   

   Non-physician

397

102 (25.7)

2.34 (1.81-3.02)

   Physician

5,175

668 (12.9)

1

Type of setting of baby's birth

   

   Hospital or clinic

5,485

728 (13.3)

1

   Birthing centre

43

7 (16.3)

1.22 (0.44-3.39)

   Private home

71

37 (52.1)

7.13 (4.24-11.98)

Type of delivery

   

   Vaginal

4,146

605 (14.6)

1.31 (1.08-1.58)

   Caesarean

1,456

168 (11.5)

1

Baby's admission to NICU

   

   No

4,875

711 (14.6)

1.83 (1.38-2.44)

   Yes

722

62 (8.6)

1

Baby's hospitalization after birth

   

   No

5,167

727 (14.1)

1.46 (1.03-2.07)

   Yes

432

44 (10.2)

1

Mother's work status <6 months of delivery

   

   No

5,084

715 (14.1)

1.30 (0.97-1.74)

   Yes

491

55 (11.2%)

1

Support after birth

   

   None/Little of time

322

61 (18.9)

1.50 (1.07-2.09)

   Some of the time

583

80 (13.7)

1.02 (0.77-1.33)

   Most/All of time

4,687

633 (13.5)

1

Province‡

   

   Eastern- Atlantic

323

28 (8.7)

1

   Eastern- Central

3,523

448 (12.7)

1.52 (1.21-1.91)

   Western- Prairies

1,056

163 (15.4)

1.89 (1.46-2.45)

   Western- British Columbia

668

128 (19.2)

2.46 (1.83-3.30)

   Northern territories

33

7 (21.2)

2.69 (2.06-3.53)

  

Unadjusted Mean difference§

(95% CI)

Mother's education level (years)

5,538

1.20 (0.97-0.43)

 

Age at first pregnancy (years)

5,527

1.88 (1.47-2.29)

 

Number of past pregnancies

5,581

0.16 (0.04-0.28)

 

Mother's age at selected birth (years)

5,581

2.04 (1.67-2.41)

 

Weight gained during pregnancy (Kg)

5,535

-0.41 (-0.94-0.12)

 

BMI before pregnancy (Kg/m2)

5,508

-0.90 (-1.31--0.48)

 

Infant's birth weight (grams)

5,590

44.39 (0.05-0.30)

 

Gestational age (weeks)

5,419

0.17 (0.95-87.84)

 

Number of stressful events

5,556

-0.23 (-0.33--0.12)

 

Number of prenatal visits

5,364

-0.07 (-0.41-0.27)

 

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale

5,529

-0.28 (-0.63-0.08)

 

* Sample size is estimated using normalized weights

† 95% CI were calculated using bootstrapping technique

‡ Eastern Atlantic: Newfoundland & Labrador, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island & New Brunswick; Eastern Central: Quebec & Ontario; Western Prairies: Manitoba, Saskatchewan, & Alberta; Western British Columbia: British Columbia; and Northern Territories: Yukon Territory, Nunavut & Northwest Territories.

§Represents the difference between the mean of exclusive breastfeeders and non- exclusive breastfeeders (Meanexclusive breastfeeders - Meannon-exclusive breastfeeders).

Table 3

Stepwise logistic regression model for the potential predictors of 6-month exclusive breastfeeding

 

Adjusted odds ratio

OR (95% CI)†

Marital status

   No partner

1

   Have a partner

1.61 (1.03-2.52)

Moms perceived health

   Excellent/very good

1.59 (0.92-2.75)

   Good

1.45 (0.82-2.57)

   Poor/Fair

1

Smoking during pregnancy

   No

2.11 (1.36-3.27)

   Yes

1

Type of setting of baby's birth

   Hospital or clinic

1

   Birthing centre

1.20 (0.42-3.39)

   Private home

5.29 (2.95-9.46)

Type of delivery

   Vaginal

1.25 (1.01-1.53)

   Caesarean

1

Baby's admission to NICU

   No

1.51 (1.12-2.03)

   Yes

1

Mother's employment status <6 months of delivery

   No

1.55 (1.14-2.10)

   Yes

1

Province‡

   Eastern- Atlantic

1

   Eastern- Central

1.15 (0.90-1.47)

   Western- Prairies

1.81 (1.38-2.38)

   Western- British Columbia

1.94 (1.42-2.64)

   Northern territories

3.02 (2.21-4.12)

Mother's education level (years)

1.08 (1.05-1.12)

Age at first pregnancy (years)

1.05 (1.03-1.07)

Number of past pregnancies

1.16 (1.09-1.23)

BMI before pregnancy (Kg/m2)

0.97 (0.95-0.99)

† 95% CI were calculated using bootstrapping technique

‡ Eastern Atlantic: Newfoundland & Labrador, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island & New Brunswick; Eastern Central: Quebec & Ontario; Western Prairies: Manitoba, Saskatchewan, & Alberta; Western British Columbia: British Columbia; and Northern Territories: Yukon Territory, Nunavut & Northwest Territories.

Discussion

The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence and predictors of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months among mothers throughout the Canadian provinces and territories. Although ever breastfeeding was 90.3%, half of the Canadian mothers exclusively breastfed their babies for 3 months and only 13.8% of the mothers remained exclusively breastfeeding for 6 months.

The exclusive breastfeeding rates decreased considerably from 1 month to 6 months among Canadian mothers. In Norway the 1-month and 4-month exclusive breastfeeding rates were 90% and 44% as compared to 63.3% and 41.4% in the present study [26]. In Quebec (1999/2000), the exclusive breastfeeding rates were 62% and 35% for 1 and 4 months of infant's age [13]. The Canadian 6-month exclusive breastfeeding rate is comparable with other developed countries. In the United States, the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months was 11.3% [27], whereas it was 10.1% in Sweden [28] and 7% in Norway [26]. The study rate, however, is lower than the rate (17%) reported earlier in Canada in 2003 by Millar & Maclean (2005). Similarly, the provincial rates reported in the present study are lower than the 2003 Canadian study [14]. The 2003 prevalence rates, for example, in British Columbia, Alberta and Ontario, were reported to be 28%, 22% and 18% respectively, while, in the present study, they were been measured as 19.2%, 15.3% and 14.5% respectively. Only Quebec illustrated a fixed rate of 10% in both surveys while New Brunswick reported an increase from 8% in 2003 to 10.9% in our study. While no data is available in 2003 for the Northern territories, the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding in this study was the highest (21.2%) as compared to all other provinces. The differences between the two studies might either be attributed to variations in study designs, sample selection and variable definitions or to an actual decline in the rate of exclusive breastfeeding in Canada.

At the multivariate analysis, years of education was the only significant socio-economic predictor of 6-month exclusive breastfeeding. The results are in accordance with the international [26, 29] and Canadian literature [9, 11, 14]. Nationally, Millar and Maclean (2005) revealed that postsecondary education was positively associated with exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months of life. Similarly in Quebec, having a university diploma increased the odds of 4-month exclusive breastfeeding [11] and not completing high school was a risk factor for early breastfeeding termination in Ontario [9]. A higher level of maternal education seems to allow mothers to formulate well-informed decisions regarding the feeding practices used for their infant.

With regard to maternal characteristics, living with a partner, having had previous pregnancies, older age at pregnancy and lower pre-pregnancy BMI was found to be significantly associated with 6-month exclusive breastfeeding. The presence of a partner is likely to provide increased support for the mother, which may ease the feeding process and the choice to exclusively breastfeed for 6 months. Although studies regarding the association between marital status and breastfeeding are inconsistent [26], the result of the present study is in agreement with studies from Norway and Germany [26, 29]. Previous Canadian studies, however, failed to demonstrate this association [11, 14]. High parity was also found to be positively associated with 6-month exclusive breastfeeding. A dose response relationship between parity and breastfeeding has been previously documented in the literature [26, 30]. Multipara mothers are suggested to have increased knowledge and self confidence from earlier breastfeeding experiences. By the same token, young age at first pregnancy decreased the likelihood of 6-month exclusive breastfeeding. Evidence in the literature provide consistent results of a positive association between breastfeeding duration and maternal age [11, 26, 29, 31]. Study results are also in agreement with the literature whereby maternal pre-pregnancy BMI was found to be negatively associated with breastfeeding [3235]. It has been postulated that heavy weight might interfere with prolactin production [32]. The psychological factors associated with heavy weight may also have an impact on breastfeeding initiation and duration [33].

Evidence of the present study suggests that smoking during pregnancy decreases the likelihood of 6-month exclusive breastfeeding. Lande et al. (2003) also reported the association between exclusive breastfeeding at 4 months and maternal smoking status after delivery to be OR = 0.40 (95% CI: 0.32, 0.50). In Canada, Albertan mothers who smoked during pregnancy were less likely to continue breastfeeding for longer periods [10]. In Southwestern Ontario, the presence of a smoker at home after delivery increased the risk of early breastfeeding termination [12].

In the present study, the place of delivery was associated with the 6 month duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Mothers giving birth at home were 5 times more likely to exclusively breastfeed than mothers giving birth at hospitals. This relationship can be attributed to the negative influence of formula supplementation in the hospital [9]. A study in a Canadian university teaching hospital reported that 47.9% of the infants received formula milk during hospital stay [36]. It is noteworthy, as well, that the characteristics of women giving birth at home are substantially different from their counterparts [37, 38] which might reflect on their breastfeeding choices. Besides the place of delivery, the type of delivery was also related to exclusive breastfeeding status. Vaginal deliveries increased the odds of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months. Pain and discomfort associated with Caesarean section may prevent the mother from breastfeeding. Results from the literature, however, are in disagreement about the relationship between the type of delivery and breastfeeding duration [30, 3941].

Infant's admission to intensive care unit and employment before 6 months from birth were negatively associated with exclusive breastfeeding. It has been reported by Jakobsen et al. (1996) that child illness is a common risk factor for shorter duration of breastfeeding. The impact of working shortly after delivery on breastfeeding termination has also been documented in previous studies [30, 39]. The proximity of the nonworking mother to her child makes breastfeeding more accessible during the first 6 months of life.

The response rate in the present study was 75.2%. The main reason for non-response was the inability to establish contact with the mothers who were initially selected from the Canadian Census of Population. However, the population weights created by Statistics Canada and used in the analysis accounted for this non-response. The cross-sectional nature of the study and inability to measure the duration of breastfeeding longitudinally stands out as another limitation. The study would have also greatly benefited from information on the mother's knowledge and opinion on exclusive breastfeeding. Information on the support available to the mother during the prenatal and postnatal period would have been very helpful as well. Despite the above facts, this is the first nationwide study that assessed a comprehensive list of potential predictors for 6-month exclusive breastfeeding across the Canadian provinces and territories. The data is representative of the Canadian mother population. The confounding effect of many covariates is also well contained. Moreover, the recall bias of the outcome variables maybe reduced as mothers were surveyed within a year of the birth of their child.

Conclusions

In Canada, almost half of the women are exclusively breastfeeding at 3 months while only 13.8% remain doing so at 6 months. Results of the present study constitute the basis for designing interventions targeting policy makers and health professionals in order to bridge the gap between the current practices of breastfeeding and the WHO recommendation. Single, less educated and nulliparous mothers should constitute a focus of these intervention programs. Finally, promoting exclusive breastfeeding rates for the first months of life is highly warranted.

Abbreviations

BMI: 

Body mass index

CI: 

Confidence interval

MES: 

Maternity Experience Survey

OR: 

Odds Ratio

SAS: 

Statistical Analysis Software

SD: 

Standard deviation

SPSS: 

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

WHO: 

World Health Organization.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

While the research and analysis are based on data from Statistics Canada, the opinions expressed do not represent the views of Statistics Canada.

The authors would like to thank the Maternity Experiences Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System, Public Health Agency of Canada and the staff at the Toronto Region - Statistics Canada Research Data Centre, in particular, Angela Prencipe and Dave Haans, for their valuable help and support.

No funding was available for this project.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Kinesiology & Health Science, York University
(2)
Community Paediatrics, University of Toronto & Department of Paediatrics, St Joseph's Health Centre

References

  1. Horta BL, Bahl R, Martines JC, Victora CG: Evidence on the long-term effects of breastfeeding. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. 2007, Geneva: World Health Organization
  2. Ip S, Chung M, raman G, Chew P, Magila N, DeVine D, Trikalinos T, lau J: Breastfeeding and maternal and child health outcomes in developed countries. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007; AHRQ Publication No 07-E007
  3. Gartner LM, Morton J, Lawrence RA, Naylor AJ, O'Hare D, Schanler RJ, Eidelman AI, American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Breastfeeding: Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2005, 115: 496-506. 10.1542/peds.2004-2491.PubMedView Article
  4. Kramer MS, Kakuma R: The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding: A systematic review. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2004, 554: 63-77.PubMedView Article
  5. World Health Organization (WHO): Up to what age can a baby stay well nourished by just being breastfed?. Accessed December/11, 2008, [http://​www.​who.​int/​features/​qa/​21/​en/​index.​html]
  6. Fewtrell MS, Morgan JB, Duggan C, Gunnlaugsson G, Hibberd PL, Lucas A, Kleinman RE: Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding: What is the evidence to support current recommendations?. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007, 85: 635S-638S.PubMed
  7. Reilly JJ, Wells JC: Duration of exclusive breast-feeding: Introduction of complementary feeding may be necessary before 6 months of age. Br J Nutr. 2005, 94: 869-872. 10.1079/BJN20051601.PubMedView Article
  8. Canadian Paediatric Society, Dietitians of Canada, Health Canada: Nutrition for healthy term infants. 2005, Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services
  9. Sheehan D, Krueger P, Watt S, Sword W, Bridle B: The Ontario mother and infant survey: Breastfeeding outcomes. J Hum Lact. 2001, 17: 211-219. 10.1177/089033440101700304.PubMedView Article
  10. Yang Q, Wen SW, Dubois L, Chen Y, Walker MC, Krewski D: Determinants of breast-feeding and weaning in Alberta, Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004, 26: 975-981.PubMed
  11. Dubois L, Girard M: Social determinants of initiation, duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding at the population level: The results of the longitudinal study of child development in Quebec (ELDEQ 1998-2002). Can J Public Health. 2003, 94: 300-305.PubMed
  12. Clifford TJ, Campbell MK, Speechley KN, Gorodzinsky F: Factors influencing full breastfeeding in a southwestern Ontario community: Assessments at 1 week and at 6 months postpartum. J Hum Lact. 2006, 22: 292-304. 10.1177/0890334406290043.PubMedView Article
  13. Haiek LN, Gauthier DL, Brosseau D, Rocheleau L: Understanding breastfeeding behavior: Rates and shifts in patterns in Quebec. J Hum Lact. 2007, 23: 24-31. 10.1177/0890334406297278.PubMedView Article
  14. Millar WJ, Maclean H: Breastfeeding practices. Health reports. 2005, 16: 23-31.
  15. Williams PL, Innis SM, Vogel AM: Breastfeeding and weaning practices in Vancouver. Can J Public Health. 1996, 87: 231-236.PubMed
  16. Black R, Godwin M, Ponka D: Breastfeeding among the Ontario James Bay Cree: A retrospective study. Can J Public Health. 2008, 99: 98-101.PubMed
  17. Sheehan D, Bridle B, Hillier T, Feightner K, Hayward S, Lee KS, Krueger P, Sword W, James M: Breastfeeding outcomes of women following uncomplicated birth in Hamilton-Wentworth. Can J Public Health. 1999, 90: 408-411.PubMed
  18. Nelson A, Sethi S: The breastfeeding experiences of Canadian teenage mothers. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2005, 34: 615-624. 10.1177/0884217505280279.PubMedView Article
  19. Simard I, O'Brien HT, Beaudoin A, Turcotte D, Damant D, Ferland S, Marcotte MJ, Jauvin N, Champoux L: Factors influencing the initiation and duration of breastfeeding among low-income women followed by the Canada prenatal nutrition program in 4 regions of Quebec. J Hum Lact. 2005, 21: 327-337. 10.1177/0890334405275831.PubMedView Article
  20. Duke PS, Parsons WL, Snow PA, Edwards AC: Physicians as mothers: Breastfeeding practices of physician-mothers in Newfoundland and Labrador. Can Fam Physician. 2007, 53: 887-91.PubMedPubMed Central
  21. Semenic S, Loiselle C, Gottlieb L: Predictors of the duration of exclusive breastfeeding among first-time mothers. Res Nurs Health. 2008, 31: 428-441. 10.1002/nur.20275.PubMedView Article
  22. Dzakpasu S, Kaczorowski J, Chalmers B, Heaman M, Duggan J, Neusy E, Maternity Experiences Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System, Public Health Agency of Canada: The Canadian maternity experiences survey: Design and methods. JOGC. 2008, 30: 207-16.PubMed
  23. Newton RW, Hunt LP: Psychosocial stress in pregnancy and its relation to low birth weight. Br Med J. 1984, 288: 1191-4. 10.1136/bmj.288.6425.1191.View Article
  24. Statistics Canada: Microdata user guide: Maternity Experiences Survey, 2006. Accessed January/2009., [http://​www.​statcan.​gc.​ca/​imdb-bmdi/​document/​5019_​D1_​T1_​V1-eng.​pdf]
  25. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R: Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987, 150: 782-786. 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782.PubMedView Article
  26. Lande B, Andersen LF, Baerug A, Trygg KU, Lund-Larsen K, Veierød MB, Bjørneboe GE: Infant feeding practices and associated factors in the first six months of life: The Norwegian infant nutrition survey. Acta Paediatr. 2003, 92: 152-161.PubMedView Article
  27. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Breastfeeding trends and updated national health objectives for exclusive breastfeeding--United States, birth years 2000-2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007, 56: 760-763.
  28. Brekke HK, Ludvigsson JF, van Odijk J, Ludvigsson J: Breastfeeding and introduction of solid foods in Swedish infants: The all babies in southeast Sweden study. Br J Nutr. 2005, 94: 377-382. 10.1079/BJN20051499.PubMedView Article
  29. Dulon M, Kersting M, Schach S: Duration of breastfeeding and associated factors in Western and Eastern Germany. Acta Paediatr. 2001, 90: 931-935. 10.1080/08035250152509690.PubMedView Article
  30. Al-Sahab B, Tamim H, Mumtaz G, Khawaja M, Khogali M, Afifi R, Nassif Y, Yunis KA, National Collaborative Perinatal Neonatal Network (NCPNN): Predictors of breast-feeding in a developing country: Results of a prospective cohort study. Public Health Nutr. 2008, 11: 1350-1356. 10.1017/S1368980008003005.PubMedView Article
  31. Scott JA, Binns CW: Factors associated with the initiation and duration of breastfeeding: A review of the literature. Breastfeed Rev. 1999, 7: 5-16.PubMed
  32. Baker JL, Michaelsen KF, Sørensen TI, Rasmussen KM: High prepregnant body mass index is associated with early termination of full and any breastfeeding in Danish women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007, 86: 404-11.PubMed
  33. Li R, Jewell S, Grummer-Strawn L: Maternal obesity and breast-feeding practices. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003, 77: 931-6.PubMed
  34. Manios Y, Grammatikaki E, Kondaki K, Ioannou E, Anastasiadou A, Birbilis M: The effect of maternal obesity on initiation and duration of breast-feeding in Greece: the GENESIS study. Public Health Nutr. 2009, 12: 517-24. 10.1017/S1368980008002838.PubMedView Article
  35. Donath SM, Amir LH: Maternal obesity and initiation and duration of breastfeeding: data from the longitudinal study of Australian children. Matern Child Nutr. 2008, 4: 163-70. 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2008.00134.x.PubMedView Article
  36. Gagnon AJ, Leduc G, Waghorn K, Yang H, Platt RW: In-hospital formula supplementation of healthy breastfeeding newborns. J Hum Lact. 2005, 21: 397-405. 10.1177/0890334405280835.PubMedView Article
  37. Hildingsson IM, Lindgren HE, Haglund B, Radestad IJ: Characteristics of women giving birth at home in Sweden: A national register study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006, 195: 1366-1372.PubMedView Article
  38. Abernathy TJ, Lentjes DM: Planned and unplanned home births and hospital births in Calgary, Alberta, 1984-87. Public Health Rep. 1989, 104: 373-377.PubMedPubMed Central
  39. Chye JK, Zain Z, Lim WL, Lim CT: Breastfeeding at 6 weeks and predictive factors. J Trop Pediatr. 1997, 43: 287-292. 10.1093/tropej/43.5.287.PubMedView Article
  40. Sharief NM, Margolis S, Townsend T: Breastfeeding patterns in Fujairah, United Arab Emirates. J Trop Pediatr. 2001, 47: 304-306. 10.1093/tropej/47.5.304.PubMedView Article
  41. Svedulf CI, Bergbom Engberg IL, Berthold H, Hoglund IE: A comparison of the incidence of breast feeding two and four months after delivery in mothers discharged within 72 hours and after 72 hours post delivery. Midwifery. 1998, 14: 37-47. 10.1016/S0266-6138(98)90113-9.PubMedView Article
  42. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1471-2431/​10/​20/​prepub

Copyright

© Al-Sahab et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.